Ard/Lazlo,

I find your position on OvmfPkg, ArmVirtPkg,and edk2-platforms in edk2 to be 
detrimental to the overall success of the edk2 project.  The majority of edk2 
consumers already have to deal with their platform not being part of the edk2 
git repo and the fact that changes to edk2 may not work or cause conflict on 
their platforms.  This is the reality of working with edk2 and building a large 
diverse set of products.  In fact, because OVMF's preferential treatment and 
presence in the edk2 tree, others in the community are burdened by those 
changes (mailing list noise, git history/commits, git repo size, etc).   From 
someone who has developed and maintained platforms with edk2 for the last 
decade +, I can tell you that having OVMF in edk2 hasn't kept the tree free 
from regressions. I also don’t use it as a source for integration requirements 
because it is vastly different than physical platforms and has very little 
resemblance to my projects.

I share your concerns about regressions, ease of development, etc. I want to 
see tianocore develop workflows and processes that work for the full community. 
 That means we must take into account the needs of those that have platforms 
outside the edk2 repo.  We must build tools that make managing all platforms 
dependencies tenable.  We must create CI that can leverage a vast number of 
platforms as an indicator of breaking changes, yet not be gated on their 
success. We must have a process that lets all interested platforms efficiently 
interact with and be part of.  The tianocore community is in need of the larger 
UEFI ecosystem engagement and we must remove the barriers to get them involved.

As always I appreciate the discussion.

Thanks
Sean

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#55673): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/55673
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/71776477/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub  [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to