On 02/05/20 01:22, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 21:44, Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Ref:        https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1512
>> Repo:       https://github.com/lersek/edk2.git
>> Branch:     smram_at_default_smbase_bz_1512_wave_1_v2
>> Supersedes: <20190924113505.27272-1-ler...@redhat.com>
>>
>> V1 is archived at:
>> - http://mid.mail-archive.com/20190924113505.27272-1-lersek@redhat.com
>> - https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/47924
>>
>> Igor's patch set, mentioned in the v1 blurb, has been merged into QEMU
>> meanwhile. The relevant QEMU commit is f404220e279c ("q35: implement
>> 128K SMRAM at default SMBASE address", 2020-01-22).
>>
>> In v2:
>> - trim the Cc list
>>
>> - pick up Jiewen's R-b for patches #1 through #9, from:
>>   - 
>> http://mid.mail-archive.com/74D8A39837DF1E4DA445A8C0B3885C503F7CBCB2@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com
>>   - https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/48166
>>
>> - add patch #10, and update patch #11, for satisfying Jiewen's condition
>>   on his R-b.
>>
>> Cc: Anthony Perard <anthony.per...@citrix.com>
>> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>
>> Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen....@intel.com>
>> Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com>
>> Cc: Julien Grall <jul...@xen.org>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Laszlo
>>
>> Laszlo Ersek (11):
>>   OvmfPkg: introduce PcdQ35SmramAtDefaultSmbase
>>   OvmfPkg/IndustryStandard: increase vertical whitespace in Q35 macro
>>     defs
>>   OvmfPkg/IndustryStandard: add MCH_DEFAULT_SMBASE* register macros
>>   OvmfPkg/PlatformPei: factor out Q35BoardVerification()
>>   OvmfPkg/PlatformPei: detect SMRAM at default SMBASE (skeleton)
>>   OvmfPkg/PlatformPei: assert there's no permanent PEI RAM at default
>>     SMBASE
>>   OvmfPkg/PlatformPei: reserve the SMRAM at the default SMBASE, if it
>>     exists
>>   OvmfPkg/SEV: don't manage the lifecycle of the SMRAM at the default
>>     SMBASE
>>   OvmfPkg/SmmAccess: close and lock SMRAM at default SMBASE
>>   OvmfPkg: introduce PcdCsmEnable feature flag
>>   OvmfPkg/PlatformPei: detect SMRAM at default SMBASE (for real)
>>
> 
> For the series,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>

Much appreciated!

Pushed via <https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/332>, commit range
422da35375c6..75839f977d37.

Laszlo

> 
> 
>>  OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Q35MchIch9.h           | 106 
>> +++++++++++---------
>>  OvmfPkg/Library/SmmCpuFeaturesLib/SmmCpuFeaturesLib.c   |  21 +++-
>>  OvmfPkg/Library/SmmCpuFeaturesLib/SmmCpuFeaturesLib.inf |   4 +
>>  OvmfPkg/OvmfPkg.dec                                     |  11 ++
>>  OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgIa32.dsc                                 |   4 +
>>  OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgIa32X64.dsc                              |   4 +
>>  OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgX64.dsc                                  |   4 +
>>  OvmfPkg/OvmfXen.dsc                                     |   3 +
>>  OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/AmdSev.c                            |  24 ++++-
>>  OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/MemDetect.c                         |  94 
>> ++++++++++++++---
>>  OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/Platform.c                          |  24 +++++
>>  OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/Platform.h                          |   7 ++
>>  OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/PlatformPei.inf                     |   2 +
>>  OvmfPkg/SmmAccess/SmmAccess2Dxe.c                       |   7 ++
>>  OvmfPkg/SmmAccess/SmmAccess2Dxe.inf                     |   1 +
>>  OvmfPkg/SmmAccess/SmmAccessPei.c                        |   6 ++
>>  OvmfPkg/SmmAccess/SmmAccessPei.inf                      |   1 +
>>  OvmfPkg/SmmAccess/SmramInternal.c                       |  25 +++++
>>  OvmfPkg/SmmAccess/SmramInternal.h                       |   8 ++
>>  19 files changed, 285 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.19.1.3.g30247aa5d201
>>
> 
> 
> 


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#53823): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/53823
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/70252369/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub  [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to