On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 19:44:38 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Use the more precise Cortex-A57 based compatible strings to describe
> the CPUs and the PMUs in the device tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>
> ---
> Silicon/AMD/Styx/Library/StyxDtbLoaderLib/StyxDtbLoaderLib.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Silicon/AMD/Styx/Library/StyxDtbLoaderLib/StyxDtbLoaderLib.c
> b/Silicon/AMD/Styx/Library/StyxDtbLoaderLib/StyxDtbLoaderLib.c
> index e723e77c7965..091d151ac722 100644
> --- a/Silicon/AMD/Styx/Library/StyxDtbLoaderLib/StyxDtbLoaderLib.c
> +++ b/Silicon/AMD/Styx/Library/StyxDtbLoaderLib/StyxDtbLoaderLib.c
> @@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ PrepareFdt (
> ArmCoreInfoTable[Index].CoreId);
> MpId = cpu_to_fdt64 (MpId);
> fdt_setprop (Fdt, CpuNode, "reg", &MpId, sizeof (MpId));
> - fdt_setprop_string (Fdt, CpuNode, "compatible", "arm,armv8");
> + fdt_setprop_string (Fdt, CpuNode, "compatible", "arm,cortex-a57");
> fdt_setprop_string (Fdt, CpuNode, "device_type", "cpu");
>
> fdt_setprop_cell (Fdt, CpuNode, "i-cache-size", 3 * SIZE_16KB);
> @@ -474,7 +474,7 @@ PrepareFdt (
> // Create /pmu node
> PmuNode = fdt_add_subnode(Fdt, 0, "pmu");
> if (PmuNode >= 0) {
> - fdt_setprop_string (Fdt, PmuNode, "compatible", "arm,armv8-pmuv3");
> + fdt_setprop_string (Fdt, PmuNode, "compatible", "arm,cortex-a57-pmu");
Since we've always only published "arm,armv8-pmuv3" before, is it
worth keeping that around as a secondary compatible string rather
than replacing it outright?
/
Leif
> // append PMU interrupts
> for (Index = 0; Index < ArmCoreCount; Index++) {
> --
> 2.17.1
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#51458): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/51458
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/62737049/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
