Pushed at fc1a95f7b1a4c157d0536bc159bc5114cdfcb9b4 -----Original Message----- From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Eric Jin Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2019 10:33 AM To: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de>; EDK II Development <devel@edk2.groups.io> Cc: Supreeth Venkatesh <supreeth.venkat...@arm.com>; Stephano Cetola <stephano.cet...@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-test] [PATCH v2 1/1] uefi-sct/SctPkg: setting key toggle state may be unsupported
Heinrich, Could you please provide your company/organization info in copyright part? I could help to add it when I push the patch. With that - Reviewed by: Eric Jin <eric....@intel.com> Best Regards Eric -----Original Message----- From: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2019 2:45 AM To: EDK II Development <devel@edk2.groups.io> Cc: Jin, Eric <eric....@intel.com>; Supreeth Venkatesh <supreeth.venkat...@arm.com>; Stephano Cetola <stephano.cet...@linux.intel.com>; Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de> Subject: [edk2-test] [PATCH v2 1/1] uefi-sct/SctPkg: setting key toggle state may be unsupported REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2169 The UEFI specification allows EFI_SIMPLE_TEXT_INPUT_EX_PROTOCOL.SetState() to return EFI_UNSUPPORTED if a state change is not supported. This for instance may be the case when connecting via a serial connection. Up to now the SCT has marked the conformance test as FAILED if SetState() was called with invalid parameters and EFI_UNSUPPORTED was returned which contradicts the specification. Instead create a warning if SetState() returns EFI_UNSUPPORTED. This allows the user to check if the non-support is justified. Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de> --- v2: Issue warning if EFI_UNSUPPORTED is returned when called with invalid parameters. --- .../BlackBoxTest/SimpleTextInputExBBTestConformance.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/SimpleTextInputEx/BlackBoxTest/SimpleTextInputExBBTestConformance.c b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/SimpleTextInputEx/BlackBoxTest/SimpleTextInputExBBTestConformance.c index d997b651..946cb274 100644 --- a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/SimpleTextInputEx/BlackBoxTest/SimpleTextInputExBBTestConformance.c +++ b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/SimpleTextInputEx/Black +++ BoxTest/SimpleTextInputExBBTestConformance.c @@ -483,8 +483,10 @@ BBTestSetStateConformanceTestCheckpoint1 ( ); } }- - if ( EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER != Status) {++ if (Status == EFI_UNSUPPORTED) {+ AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_WARNING;+ } else if (Status != EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER) { AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_FAILED; } else { AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_PASSED;-- 2.20.1 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#47246): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/47246 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/34106966/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-