REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2169
The UEFI specification allows EFI_SIMPLE_TEXT_INPUT_EX_PROTOCOL.SetState()
to return EFI_UNSUPPORTED if a state change is not supported. This for
instance may be the case when connecting via a serial connection.
Up to now the SCT has marked the conformance test as FAILED if SetState()
was called with invalid parameters and EFI_UNSUPPORTED was returned which
contradicts the specification.
Instead create a warning if SetState() returns EFI_UNSUPPORTED. This allows
the user to check if the non-support is justified.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de>
---
v2:
Issue warning if EFI_UNSUPPORTED is returned when called with
invalid parameters.
---
.../BlackBoxTest/SimpleTextInputExBBTestConformance.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/SimpleTextInputEx/BlackBoxTest/SimpleTextInputExBBTestConformance.c
b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/SimpleTextInputEx/BlackBoxTest/SimpleTextInputExBBTestConformance.c
index d997b651..946cb274 100644
---
a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/SimpleTextInputEx/BlackBoxTest/SimpleTextInputExBBTestConformance.c
+++
b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/SimpleTextInputEx/BlackBoxTest/SimpleTextInputExBBTestConformance.c
@@ -483,8 +483,10 @@ BBTestSetStateConformanceTestCheckpoint1 (
);
}
}
-
- if ( EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER != Status) {
+
+ if (Status == EFI_UNSUPPORTED) {
+ AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_WARNING;
+ } else if (Status != EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER) {
AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_FAILED;
} else {
AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_PASSED;
--
2.20.1
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#47136): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/47136
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/34106966/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
