> -----Original Message----- > From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Laszlo Ersek > Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2019 7:24 AM > To: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindh...@linaro.org>; Ni, Ray <ray...@intel.com> > Cc: Gao, Liming <liming....@intel.com>; Cetola, Stephano > <stephano.cet...@intel.com>; Kinney, Michael D > <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>; jayanth.raghu...@dell.com; 'Andrew Fish > (af...@apple.com)' <af...@apple.com>; > wei.g....@dell.com; devel@edk2.groups.io > Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] MdePkg/DxeHstiLib: Added checks to improve > error handling. > > On 08/29/19 11:49, Leif Lindholm wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 05:33:28PM +0000, Ni, Ray wrote: > > >> With the existence of mail attachments capability in new groups.io > >> system, can we accept such kind of patch submission? Or any side > >> effect you see if allowing mail attachments? > > > > Traditionally, the reason for not wanting patches as attachments is > > that it complicates doing inline code review as part of the email. > > > > If the mail system (let's take a wild guess, Outlook/Exchange?) > > doesn't corrupt the text *too* badly, I don't have an issue with the > > patch being sent in the message body *and* being attached so it could > > actually be applied.
Leif, So, message body should have the patch changes for easy inline review. It's optional to carry a .diff attachment. Is my understanding correct? > > - Doesn't work for patch series, only for single patches. Laszlo, Do you mean attachment is not allowed for a series of patch? Why? A mail can carry multiple attachments. That makes the patch series easy to fetch in my opinion from Outlook. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#46578): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/46578 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/33041050/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-