Ray,

Yes.  I think it makes sense to move both.

Please include the contributor of Amd/Cpuid.h to
the reviews of that move.  It would be good to see
as much feedback as possible on this change.

Thanks,

Mike

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ni, Ray
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2019 7:27 PM
> To: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>;
> Gao, Liming <liming....@intel.com>;
> devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Dong, Eric <eric.d...@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek
> <ler...@redhat.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 5/6] MdePkg/Cpuid.h: Move
> Cpuid.h from UefiCpuPkg to MdePkg
> 
> Mike,
> Thanks for the time for offline discussion.
> I agree with the idea to have an Intel/Cpuid.h in
> MdePkg/Include/Register/ directory.
> 
> Do you prefer to move Amd/Cpuid.h to
> MdePkg/Include/Register/ in my V3 patch?
> 
> Thanks,
> Ray
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kinney, Michael D
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2019 12:31 AM
> > To: Gao, Liming <liming....@intel.com>; Ni, Ray
> <ray...@intel.com>;
> > devel@edk2.groups.io; Kinney, Michael D
> <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>
> > Cc: Dong, Eric <eric.d...@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek
> <ler...@redhat.com>
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 5/6] MdePkg/Cpuid.h: Move
> Cpuid.h from
> > UefiCpuPkg to MdePkg
> >
> > Liming,
> >
> > Yes.  That would be the correct include statement for
> a module/lib
> > that depends on MdePkg.
> >
> > I know we have modules/libs that use the UefiCpuPkg
> and use #include
> > <Register/Cpuid.h>.  If we want to provide
> compatibility with all
> > consumers of the UefiCpuPkg, the Cpuid.h file in the
> UefiCpuPkg can
> > updated to simply include <Register/Intel/Cpuid.h>
> from MdePkg.  We
> > could also choose to update those consumers to use
> the new path in the
> > MdePkg.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Gao, Liming
> > > Sent: Monday, July 29, 2019 8:49 PM
> > > To: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>;
> Ni, Ray
> > > <ray...@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io
> > > Cc: Dong, Eric <eric.d...@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek
> > > <ler...@redhat.com>
> > > Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 5/6] MdePkg/Cpuid.h: Move
> Cpuid.h from
> > > UefiCpuPkg to MdePkg
> > >
> > > Mike:
> > >   OK. If so, the consumer code also need to
> obviously include vendor
> > > header file, such as #include
> <Register/Intel/Cpuid.h>. Right?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Liming
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Kinney, Michael D
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 11:42 AM
> > > > To: Gao, Liming <liming....@intel.com>; Ni, Ray
> > > <ray...@intel.com>;
> > > > devel@edk2.groups.io; Kinney, Michael D
> > > <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>
> > > > Cc: Dong, Eric <eric.d...@intel.com>; Laszlo
> Ersek
> > > <ler...@redhat.com>
> > > > Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 5/6] MdePkg/Cpuid.h: Move
> > > Cpuid.h from
> > > > UefiCpuPkg to MdePkg
> > > >
> > > > Liming,
> > > >
> > > > There is an unresolved discussion on the location
> of
> > > this file in the
> > > > MdePkg.  I prefer a vendor name in the path.
> > > >
> > > >     MdePkg/Include/Register/Intel/Cpuid.h
> > > >
> > > > Also, after this file is moved to MdePkg, we can
> > > enter new BZs to
> > > > update all the modules that call AsmCpuid and
> > > AsmCpuidEx to use the
> > > > defines and structures from Cpuid.h.
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Gao, Liming
> > > > > Sent: Monday, July 29, 2019 8:29 PM
> > > > > To: Ni, Ray <ray...@intel.com>;
> > > devel@edk2.groups.io
> > > > > Cc: Kinney, Michael D
> <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>;
> > > Dong, Eric
> > > > > <eric.d...@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek
> > > <ler...@redhat.com>
> > > > > Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 5/6] MdePkg/Cpuid.h:
> Move
> > > Cpuid.h from
> > > > > UefiCpuPkg to MdePkg
> > > > >
> > > > > The change is good to me. Reviewed-by: Liming
> Gao
> > > > > <liming....@intel.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Ni, Ray
> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2019 6:00 PM
> > > > > > To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> > > > > > Cc: Kinney, Michael D
> > > <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>;
> > > > > Gao, Liming
> > > > > > <liming....@intel.com>; Dong, Eric
> > > > > <eric.d...@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek
> > > > > > <ler...@redhat.com>
> > > > > > Subject: [PATCH V2 5/6] MdePkg/Cpuid.h: Move
> > > Cpuid.h
> > > > > from UefiCpuPkg
> > > > > > to MdePkg
> > > > > >
> > > > > > REF:
> > > > >
> https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2008
> > > > > >
> > > > > > MdeModulePkg/DxeIpl needs to get CPUID output
> for
> > > CPU
> > > > > 5-level paging
> > > > > > capability detection.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In order to use the macros/structures defined
> in
> > > > > > UefiCpuPkg/Include/Register/Cpuid.h, the
> patch
> > > moves
> > > > > Cpuid.h to
> > > > > > MdePkg/Include/Register/ directory.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Because almost every module depends on
> MdePkg.dec
> > > in
> > > > > its INF file, the
> > > > > > move almost has no impact.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ray Ni <ray...@intel.com>
> > > > > > Cc: Michael D Kinney
> <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>
> > > > > > Cc: Liming Gao <liming....@intel.com>
> > > > > > Cc: Eric Dong <eric.d...@intel.com>
> > > > > > Cc: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >  {UefiCpuPkg =>
> MdePkg}/Include/Register/Cpuid.h
> > > | 0
> > > > > >  1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0
> deletions(-)
> > > > > rename {UefiCpuPkg
> > > > > > => MdePkg}/Include/Register/Cpuid.h (100%)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git
> a/UefiCpuPkg/Include/Register/Cpuid.h
> > > > > > b/MdePkg/Include/Register/Cpuid.h similarity
> > > index
> > > > > 100% rename from
> > > > > > UefiCpuPkg/Include/Register/Cpuid.h
> > > > > > rename to MdePkg/Include/Register/Cpuid.h
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > 2.21.0.windows.1


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#44743): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/44743
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/32582439/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub  [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to