Hi, Is secretary workbench broken?
The ICLA was filed and an account was requested. But instead of "wayang" being in the new account request, it was incubator. Pasted here from the commit to acreq: +++ infrastructure/trunk/acreq/new-account-reqs.txt [utf-8] Thu May 4 14:29:35 2023 @@ -21,3 +21,4 @@ ## ## new account requests ## +kbeedkar;Kaustubh Beedkar;kbeed...@gmail.com;incubator;incubator;05-04-2023;yes;yes;no I'm very sure that wayang was specified in secretary workbench. Is the podling not ready to accept new committers? It's two plus years old already... Thanks Craig > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: Kaustubh Beedkar added to Wayang committers > Date: May 6, 2023 at 20:09:55 PDT > To: Craig Russell <apache....@gmail.com>, Christofer Dutz <cd...@apache.org>, > Craig Russell <c...@apache.org> > > On Sat, May 6, 2023 at 10:04 PM Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com > <mailto:gst...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >... > There certainly hasn't been a change on the Infra side. Our account creation > script just looks at what project was selected, and puts the person into that > group. In this case, it saw "incubator". > > Sorry, my language was imprecise. Not "selected" but "specified/committed > into the workflow". See the commit for the account request here: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/2qn3ngn9w710rms9nhsqx1x7mn882owb > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/2qn3ngn9w710rms9nhsqx1x7mn882owb> > > Cheers, > -g > Craig L Russell c...@apache.org
