> On Nov 16, 2017, at 4:39 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 16 November 2017 at 23:12, Craig Russell <apache....@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Sebb, >> >>> On Nov 16, 2017, at 1:40 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 16 November 2017 at 19:40, Craig Russell <apache....@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> The roster/pmc display validates email addresses for subscribers, and >>>> flags Asf Members who are subscribed who are not PMC members. >>>> >>>> Is this really necessary? First impression is that it's an error. >>> >>> Previously the display only showed the unmatched emails, and did not >>> try to associate them with committers/members. >> >> The new display is better in that it does try to explain why there might be >> a mismatch. >> >> I've thought about this some more and I think the best solution is to have >> two separate paragraphs: >> unmatched emails against current pmc members -- these are things that the >> PMC should try to fix >> >> ASF Members who have subscribed -- this is just FYI (transparency) to the PMC > > Should be better now.
Yes. Much Better. I was going to use ALL CAPS again but once a day is enough. Craig > >> Craig >>> >>> I suppose it could now ignore the ASF members. >>> >>>> Perhaps it could be in a different part of the display. >>>> >>>> I'm all for transparency, but this is confusing. >>>> >>>> >>>> Craig L Russell >>>> Secretary, Apache Software Foundation >>>> c...@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo >>>> >> >> Craig L Russell >> Secretary, Apache Software Foundation >> c...@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo >> Craig L Russell Secretary, Apache Software Foundation c...@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo
