> On Nov 16, 2017, at 4:39 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 16 November 2017 at 23:12, Craig Russell <apache....@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Sebb,
>> 
>>> On Nov 16, 2017, at 1:40 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 16 November 2017 at 19:40, Craig Russell <apache....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> The roster/pmc display validates email addresses for subscribers, and 
>>>> flags Asf Members who are subscribed who are not PMC members.
>>>> 
>>>> Is this really necessary?  First impression is that it's an error.
>>> 
>>> Previously the display only showed the unmatched emails, and did not
>>> try to associate them with committers/members.
>> 
>> The new display is better in that it does try to explain why there might be 
>> a mismatch.
>> 
>> I've thought about this some more and I think the best solution is to have 
>> two separate paragraphs:
>> unmatched emails against current pmc members -- these are things that the 
>> PMC should try to fix
>> 
>> ASF Members who have subscribed -- this is just FYI (transparency) to the PMC
> 
> Should be better now.

Yes. Much Better. I was going to use ALL CAPS again but once a day is enough.

Craig

> 
>> Craig
>>> 
>>> I suppose it could now ignore the ASF members.
>>> 
>>>> Perhaps it could be in a different part of the display.
>>>> 
>>>> I'm all for transparency, but this is confusing.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>> Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
>>>> c...@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>> 
>> 
>> Craig L Russell
>> Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
>> c...@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo
>> 

Craig L Russell
Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
c...@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo

Reply via email to