On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 10:03 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 4 March 2016 at 00:19, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 4:35 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 3 March 2016 at 21:12, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: >>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:50 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On 3 March 2016 at 13:28, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:22 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Better would be to have a function to report which entries are >>>>>>> missing, so the user can decide which they want to download based on >>>>>>> what they are testing. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Maybe also with a function to report which are out of date. >>>>>> >>>>>> I've roughed in such a tool. You will need to do a "bundle update" or >>>>>> otherwise get the latest Wunderbar (1.0.21) to test it out locally. >>>>>> Then run: >>>>>> >>>>>> ruby www/status/svn.cgi >>>>>> >>>>>> And then visit http://localhost:4567/ >>>>> >>>>> That's very cool. >>>>> >>>>> I'd like to add the local path details if not in read-only mode. >>>>> Would that be OK? >>>> >>>> Local path details are already there :-) >>>> >>>> Go to https://whimsy.apache.org/status/svn and hover over any text in >>>> the first column. >>> >>> I see, that's useful. >>> >>> However one cannot copy the hover text nor search it except by looking >>> at the source. >> >> OK, so how about a column that only shows if the window is wide enough? >> >> https://github.com/apache/whimsy/commit/c26dbfdd4b0a258b3fdbdb7f122d0da4e6b606c6 > > Great, though maybe it should be disabled for the read-only case i.e. > on the live system.
I don't see the harm. > Maybe it could depend on whether the script was run directly or via > the webserver? > > If run under a webserver, one probably does not want the buttons either. I'm currently running it under a webserver with suexec enabled, and the buttons work for me. That being said, if/when you try out https://whimsy.apache.org/test/vhost-generator and it gets to the point where it works for you, I plan to switch to that. The secretary workbench is the only remaining application that updates files in the svn working directory (something that has proven to be problematic), and its eventual replacement (the secmail tool) will no longer do that. So I won't need suexec any more. In any case, you don't need my permission to make updates. >>>> I did it this way so that super-wide screens aren't required. >>>> >>>> - Sam Ruby >> >> - Sam Ruby - Sam Ruby
