On 4 March 2016 at 00:19, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 4:35 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 3 March 2016 at 21:12, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:50 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 3 March 2016 at 13:28, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:22 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Better would be to have a function to report which entries are >>>>>> missing, so the user can decide which they want to download based on >>>>>> what they are testing. >>>>>> >>>>>> Maybe also with a function to report which are out of date. >>>>> >>>>> I've roughed in such a tool. You will need to do a "bundle update" or >>>>> otherwise get the latest Wunderbar (1.0.21) to test it out locally. >>>>> Then run: >>>>> >>>>> ruby www/status/svn.cgi >>>>> >>>>> And then visit http://localhost:4567/ >>>> >>>> That's very cool. >>>> >>>> I'd like to add the local path details if not in read-only mode. >>>> Would that be OK? >>> >>> Local path details are already there :-) >>> >>> Go to https://whimsy.apache.org/status/svn and hover over any text in >>> the first column. >> >> I see, that's useful. >> >> However one cannot copy the hover text nor search it except by looking >> at the source. > > OK, so how about a column that only shows if the window is wide enough? > > https://github.com/apache/whimsy/commit/c26dbfdd4b0a258b3fdbdb7f122d0da4e6b606c6
Great, though maybe it should be disabled for the read-only case i.e. on the live system. Maybe it could depend on whether the script was run directly or via the webserver? If run under a webserver, one probably does not want the buttons either. >>> I did it this way so that super-wide screens aren't required. >>> >>> - Sam Ruby > > - Sam Ruby