We always need the original syntax to enable bidirectional property. It does not hurt though to enable sugars that allows us to have a combination on top. How about we start with the original syntax and then discuss sugar as a separate topic
-- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/70#issuecomment-1149818365 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/70/c1149818...@github.com>
