@wrongtest I've thought about the option A3 vs A4. From the parsing / translation from TVM script to TIR, it is acceptable to have `T.allocate` translated to `Allocate + DeclBuffer` two nodes. But it will be tricky for `TVMScriptPrinter`. We will need to find both `Allocate` and `DeclBuffer` nodes and then print `T.allocate`, and these two nodes do not have to be parent/child of each other. I'm not sure if this behavior, which breaks 1-to-1 mapping between TVM script and TIR, is desirable. Alternatively, we can add an option to `T.allocate`, such as `def allocate(..., return_buffer: bool)`. What do you think?
-- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/70#issuecomment-1133153361 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/70/c1133153...@github.com>
