> I think the main outstanding thing is the question of support here. I'd love > for a few more folks to weigh in, tagging a few folks who may have ideas: > @tqchen @jroesch @kparzysz-quic @u99127 @Mousius @leandron @comaniac @zhiics > @Hzfengsy @ZihengJiang @yzhliu @masahi @icemelon > > broadly, the question is: once we release version `0.X.0`, should we discover > a bug, we should likely fix it on that branch and on `main` and release > `0.X.Y`. how long shall we commit to doing that? If a bug is discovered on > `0.X-1.0`, will we fix it? > > my vote is the following (for now, we can revisit at 1.0): > > * we agree we will fix major bugs on `0.X.Y` where `0.X.Y` is the latest > release.
Agreed. > * when we make a new minor version release e.g. `0.(X+1).0`, we will stop > maintaining releases starting with `0.X.` at that time. Agreed. > * committers/pmcs should exercise their judgement when determining if > something warrants a fix. > * the same policy should apply on the forum--if someone asks a question on an > old minor release version, it should be acceptable to ask them to reproduce > it on the latest release. I agree and I'd be stronger that the bug needs to be reproducible on trunk / main and the latest release. How do we get this moving forward ? R -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/67#issuecomment-1134809529 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/67/c1134809...@github.com>
