> my vote is the following (for now, we can revisit at 1.0): > > * we agree we will fix major bugs on `0.X.Y` where `0.X.Y` is the latest > release. > * when we make a new minor version release e.g. `0.(X+1).0`, we will stop > maintaining releases starting with `0.X.` at that time. > * committers/pmcs should exercise their judgement when determining if > something warrants a fix. > * the same policy should apply on the forum--if someone asks a question on an > old minor release version, it should be acceptable to ask them to reproduce > it on the latest release.
Just checking for my understanding, this would be: * Release 0.9.0 next * We find a bug, release 0.9.1 * 0.9.1 is now the only supported release * 0.10.0 comes out * 0.10.0 is now the only supported release Who does the patch releases? I'm assuming the nominated release person from `0.9.0` ? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/67#issuecomment-1124146916 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/67/c1124146...@github.com>
