Thanks folks for discussions. I think they summarizes to the following points
- Q0: Subfield grouping (e.g. features) or simply leave as top-level attrs
- Q1: Folder structure: `target/preprocessors/cuda.cc` vs
`target/cuda/cuda_preprocessor.cc`
- Note that code-reuse is less likely going to be an issue as there can be
common includes among sub-folder structures.
- Q2: How to reconcile attributes specified already for (part of) subfield
group, `llvm` can use `mattr` to specify the feature necessary. What happens to
CUDA(e.g. we proposing to group hw related limitations to features), and how
can we specify some of the existing feature fields during tag registration.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/71#issuecomment-1133013784
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/71/c1133013...@github.com>
