> Im wondering whether should we provide an optional partitioning hook as well > -- so then it can be anything (i.e. any Sequential) and let the default be a > Sequential of MergeComposite, AnnotateTarget, MergeCompilerRegions, > ParititionGraph. WDYT ?
Considering how partitioning is handled in #62 I would probably prefer a more declarative way of specifying different partitioning patterns. @MichaelJKlaiber @PaulPalomeroBernardo -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/60#issuecomment-1069204741 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/60/c1069204...@github.com>
