> Deleting an issue is not something we should do - keeping a record of why > something was rejected is useful on a later date to know why but perhaps the > issue of too many issues with the label is solved by a query for open > rfc-tracking issues ? > > Ramana
I think the record would always be kept here. IIUC, tracking issues in the main repo are only used to track the RFC implementation progress, which is not necessary for rejected RFCs. IMHO this can also save some times for authors: If an RFC is rejected, then authors don't even need to waste time proposing an implementation plan. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/13#issuecomment-887701334
