Hi @comaniac, Thanks for suggesting this, it's been on my mind :smile_cat:
I'd suggest that "nearly done" is ambiguous? As a less ambiguous alternative I'd propose always opening a tracking issue (if the RFC is big enough to require it) when you raise an RFC and if it ultimately gets rejected we just close the issue? This also allows code to evolve alongside the RFC. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/13#issuecomment-887686396
