E... @junrushao1994 I guess @merrymercy 's opinion is that doing analysis in TE is quicker than using the ISL.
ISL is sure a powerful tool for loop analyse, but in my understanding we should lower the schedule to C code first before using ISL? Which I think is more time consuming. Currently, Ansor applies some simple but useful analyses based on TE. Though it may not be as accurate as ISL does, but it's cheap. Then we count on the tuning to try lots of uncertain schedules and find the best one by measuring. --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-tensorir-a-schedulable-ir-for-tvm/7872/36) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/email/unsubscribe/ed7bad22d57cd3d30d99cfba8be5dd21289c41a85ad4e40e8ab21b989b3c9b4f).
