How is the compilation speed compared to the original TE? In Ansor/Autotvm, we have to compile a lot of schedules for feature extraction, so the speed of schedule transformation matters.
Do you have any benchmark results? Intuitively, I think the original TE will be faster because it can do a batched bound inference and AST construction. If it is true, how can we fix this performance gap? --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-tensorir-a-schedulable-ir-for-tvm/7872/34) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/email/unsubscribe/d44828c61231fffb080d241914c92520cd26123d675c2c0a96aac51d5d97bab2).
