Is the current naming based on some SNMP MIB spec? Personally, my indifference is boundless. This change will I think lead to some logistic aggravation, due to scripts that take metrics output as input.
Any chance it's worth it to make the prefix configurable? On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 9:41 PM James Peach <jpe...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > On 18 Dec 2023, at 1:28 pm, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Through all our cleanup and refactoring in the past, as far as I can > tell, all metrics are now prefixed with proxy.process. > > > > This seems a little superfluous. I’d like to suggests one of two options: > > > > 1. Just drop the prefix entirely. > > > > 2. Replace the prefix with “ats”. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > What would be the impact on existing deployments? > > J
