> On Dec 18, 2023, at 3:40 AM, Damian Meden <damian.me...@yahooinc.com.INVALID>
> wrote:
>
> +1 to remove the `proxy.process`
>
> I don't like either #1 or #2 although I agree to have a single prefix. I
> think eventually we will have this same conversation about `proxy.config`
> so to me a name that means the scope of the record should be used, `ats`
> seems too generic as can also be used by a config record(unless this is
> what we want).
>
> Maybe just `metric` or `stat` could work.
To distinguish from “config” ? I mean, it’s obviously a metric or stat at this
point already :).
— Leif
>
> Thanks.
> Damian.
>
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 3:29 AM Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Through all our cleanup and refactoring in the past, as far as I can tell,
>> all metrics are now prefixed with proxy.process.
>>
>> This seems a little superfluous. I’d like to suggests one of two options:
>>
>> 1. Just drop the prefix entirely.
>>
>> 2. Replace the prefix with “ats”.
>>
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> — Leif
>>
>>
