It seems that some are not convinced of the need to use RAII. I won' t get into that, it's easy to find writeups advocating for it, which are better than anything I could write.
I have no strong feelings about how things are spelled or abbreviated. On Sat, Sep 2, 2023 at 11:22 PM James Peach <jpe...@apache.org> wrote: > > > On 2 Sep 2023, at 3:44 am, Masakazu Kitajo <m4s...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Its a judgement call, how much to minimize the API. > > > > Yes, that's why we send API proposals on the dev list. And I don't think > > I'm absolutely right. If we, as a community, want to have utilities as TS > > API, that's what we should do. I'm disappointed that others don't join > this > > discussion, but if they don't mind making Cleanup.h TS API, that means we > > have many potential maintainers. I guess I could just abide and hope you > > and they maintain it. > > > > Is providing Cleanup.h as TS API the one and only way? I don't understand > > why not promoting Cleanup.h means inevitable resource leak. Plugin > > developers can take care of it in their own way, right? One could copy > > Cleanup.h anytime if they want. > > It looks like there’s only one internal plugin using this, so it’s not > self-evidently essential. How about adopting it internally before making it > public API? > > Also, could we change it to spell `UniqPtr` correctly? > > J
