> On Aug 17, 2023, at 07:11, Walt Karas <wka...@yahooinc.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> Does anyone have objections to the general plan to deprecate the C++ API?
I’m ok deprecating it :).
>
> Since include/tscpp/api/Cleanup.h is distinct from the rest to the C++ API
> (designed to support the C-style API rather than enacapsulate it), I
> propose moving it to include/ts and not deprecating it:
> https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/10231
I’ve been thinking about this. I wonder if we should have “modular” include
files rather than one big monster included file going forward? Like how libswoc
and most other libraries does :).
We can still add / modify to the existing ts.h “module” as needed (its
implementation is in InkAPI.cc). But this is why input the new metrics APIs in
include/api/Metrics.h and src-api/Metrics.cc.
Thoughts? Maybe a discussion to have on a different thread?
— Leif
>
>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 6:18 PM Walt Karas <wka...@yahooinc.com> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 2:39 PM Chris McFarlen <ch...@mcfarlen.us> wrote:
>>>
>>> The cpp plugin API is being deprecated for 10.0 (tscpp/api/*). I'd like
>>> to just remove the examples immediately for 10.0 since we don't need
>>> examples for a deprecated API. Removing them now will also create less work
>>> for the CMake build. Please vote and/or express any concerns about this.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Chris
>>>
>>> Sent with [Proton Mail](
>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://proton.me/__;!!Op6eflyXZCqGR5I!F7fmmyOYggHH3sfe66Yv6v1z3dq9Jukk6YGb1uHadpgER3L_rFhZKcsbUlefoe1YmRic6ffK6wzuuOSh$
>>> ) secure email.
>>
>>
