http://jonisalonen.com/2012/calling-c-from-java-is-easy/

I don't know if there is a way to call Java from C or C++, which you would
also need to have a Java plugin.  If no one is currently doing anything
like this we probably shouldn't worry about it.

On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 10:54 AM Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:

>
>
> > On May 17, 2019, at 9:48 AM, Walt Karas <wka...@verizonmedia.com.INVALID>
> wrote:
> >
> > But are there people who write plugins in other languages (like Java for
> > example) that can call C functions, but not C++ functions?  If so,
> wouldn't
> > this break their plugins?
>
>
> Never heard of that. How would someone do that ? You can write Java such
> that the C-callbacks / continuations from ATS somehow gets called into the
> appropriate Java API? dlopen() would need to find all these entry points in
> the .so.
>
> — leif
>
> >
> > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 8:41 AM Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> If we change this, such that all plugins must be compiled with C++
> >> compilers, we have the liberty of using C++’ism in the public
> interfaces,
> >> such as ts/ts.h and ts/remap.h. This has benefits, such as being able to
> >> expose internal APIs of ATS without going through complex glue
> interfaces
> >> and opaque pointers.
> >>
> >> The disadvantage is that keeping ABI compatibility is a fair amount more
> >> tricky. However, I don’t feel this is a significant issue, as long as we
> >> don’t break it within minor / patch releases. It does make things
> trickier
> >> here too though, so we have to be open to the possibility of accidental
> >> breakage of ABI compatibility.
> >>
> >> I think the advantages outweighs the disadvantages. The tasks for this
> is
> >> tracked on
> >>
> >>        https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/5360
> >>
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> — leif
> >>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to