> On Feb 7, 2018, at 11:47 AM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> discussed this with a few of you, but I’d like to take this to the community. 
> There’s some requests to get features back ported to 7.1.x, which I’m for now 
> postponing to a possible future 7.2.x release. This was the intention of the 
> proposal we agreed upon last year, to bring stability as well as agility to 
> our release process.
> 
> Now, I’m not strongly opposed to allowing for new features to go into say a 
> v7.1.3 release, however, before we do so, I’d like to make sure that this is 
> *really* what we want to do going forward. I care mostly about consistency, 
> such that there’s no arguing as to “why did amc’s feature get into v7.1.3, 
> whereas my future has to wait until v7.2.0 or v8.0.0”. 
> 
> Fwiw, 7.1.1 - 7.1.3 thus far has avoided adding new features to the 7.1.x 
> branch. So going forward, I think we have two options:
> 
>       1) Allow “safe” (where “safe” is defined by the RM) features to go into 
> any patch releases.
> 
>       2) Stick with the original plan, and only allow new features in either 
> major, or minor releases (e.g. v7.2.0 or v8.0.0).
> 
> 
> 
> 
> If we change our policy to #1, I think we should eliminate the plans for 
> doing minor releases, i.e. v8.0.x will be the only release in the v8.x 
> release cycle.
> 


Forgot, there’s a column with the current v7.2.0 candidates on this page:

        https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/projects/3?



I imagine if we change policy to #1 above, we’ll merge all these into v7.1.3 or 
v7.1.4.

— leif


Reply via email to