> On Mar 1, 2017, at 12:32 AM, Shu Kit Chan <chanshu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> It looks like .luaconf is the winner.
> 
> I will also be creating new issues for changing the existing
> logging.config and metrics.config accordingly.

If we can support both the old and the new suffixes for a transition time (for 
metrics and logging) that'd be cool.

Cheers,

-- Leif 
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Kit
> 
> 
>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 8:17 AM, Shu Kit Chan <chanshu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The reasoning is like this. As we make more changes for other
>> configuration files such as storage.config, cache.config,
>> congestion.config, ... etc , it is more convenient for our users to
>> keep the same name with a different suffix to signal the difference
>> being made.
>> 
>> And as we finalize on a suffix, we would also need to go back and
>> change metrics.config and logging.config accordingly ( and of course
>> we should support both naming convention for backward compatibility
>> for 7.x for both)
>> 
>> I am +1 on .luaconf
>> 
>> 
>>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 7:32 AM, James Peach <jpe...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Feb 26, 2017, at 10:35 PM, Shu Kit Chan <chanshu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> We had recently converted the the custom log and metrics configuration
>>>> files to lua (in 7.0.0 and 6.2.0 release respectively). In doing so,
>>>> we came up with new configuration file names as well. i.e
>>>> logging.config and metrics.config , respectively.
>>>> 
>>>> We are now trying to come up with a better suffix for these “lua"
>>> 
>>> What’s wrong with the status quo? Can you please spell out some of the 
>>> reasoning behind this?
>>> 
>>>> style configuration files as we are attempting to convert more
>>>> configuration to this "lua" style. Here are a few suggestions from
>>>> Leif.
>>>> 
>>>> .cfg
>>>> .conf
>>>> .lua
>>>> .luacfg
>>>> .luaconf
>>> 
>>> My 2c is either .config or .lua.
>>> 
>>>> e.g. If we pick .lua as our suffix naming convention, we will be
>>>> replacing functionality in storage.config with a "lua" style
>>>> configuration file named as storage.lua
>>>> 
>>>> Any other opinions here?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks.
>>>> 
>>>> Kit
>>> 

Reply via email to