It looks like .luaconf is the winner. I will also be creating new issues for changing the existing logging.config and metrics.config accordingly.
Thanks. Kit On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 8:17 AM, Shu Kit Chan <chanshu...@gmail.com> wrote: > The reasoning is like this. As we make more changes for other > configuration files such as storage.config, cache.config, > congestion.config, ... etc , it is more convenient for our users to > keep the same name with a different suffix to signal the difference > being made. > > And as we finalize on a suffix, we would also need to go back and > change metrics.config and logging.config accordingly ( and of course > we should support both naming convention for backward compatibility > for 7.x for both) > > I am +1 on .luaconf > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 7:32 AM, James Peach <jpe...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> On Feb 26, 2017, at 10:35 PM, Shu Kit Chan <chanshu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> We had recently converted the the custom log and metrics configuration >>> files to lua (in 7.0.0 and 6.2.0 release respectively). In doing so, >>> we came up with new configuration file names as well. i.e >>> logging.config and metrics.config , respectively. >>> >>> We are now trying to come up with a better suffix for these “lua" >> >> What’s wrong with the status quo? Can you please spell out some of the >> reasoning behind this? >> >>> style configuration files as we are attempting to convert more >>> configuration to this "lua" style. Here are a few suggestions from >>> Leif. >>> >>> .cfg >>> .conf >>> .lua >>> .luacfg >>> .luaconf >> >> My 2c is either .config or .lua. >> >>> e.g. If we pick .lua as our suffix naming convention, we will be >>> replacing functionality in storage.config with a "lua" style >>> configuration file named as storage.lua >>> >>> Any other opinions here? >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> Kit >>
