On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Alan M. Carroll < [email protected]> wrote:
> Theo, > > Sunday, July 20, 2014, 11:19:11 AM, you wrote: > > > Any reason to not simply use ck_hs and ck_ht from concurrency kit? That > was > > one of the points of looking at that library. > > On Jul 19, 2014 11:33 PM, "Alan M. Carroll" <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > Only administrative reasons, in that as far as I know CK is not yet > officially part of the ATS core. > > We should fix that, but just use it to back your API.
