Any reason to not simply use ck_hs and ck_ht from concurrency kit? That was
one of the points of looking at that library.
On Jul 19, 2014 11:33 PM, "Alan M. Carroll" <[email protected]>
wrote:

> As part of my work on TS-2863 (FQDN support for server session sharing) I
> implemented a new variety of hash table. I did this because none of the
> current hash table implementations were adequate. I hope this one is useful
> enough to be adopted as the standard.
>
> The key point of this implementation is that it uses the internal link
> support from List.h to handle chaining in the hash table. This gives it key
> advantages over all of the existing implementations.
>
> 1) TCL hash table - no TCL. 'nuff said.
>
> 2) HashTable - items can be removed. (Yes, seriously, this one does *not*
> support delete/remove of items).
>
> 3) ChainHashTable - no separate allocation.
>
> It also has a documented interface which should make it easier to use.
>
> I have attached a patch with the implementation and documentation to
> TS-2948.
>
>

Reply via email to