Maybe rename "ClientProtoType" to "ClientProtocolStack" would be more descriptive.
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Yunkai Zhang <yunkai...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote: > >> >> On Mar 6, 2014, at 7:25 PM, Alan M. Carroll <a...@network-geographics.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Perhaps "scheme" for the HTTP vs. HTTPS vs. SPDY - I think that's what >> the internal use. "Proto" and "Protocol" are somewhat vague. >> >> "scheme" is certainly the correct nomenclature according to e.g. RFC3986. >> > > For HTTP/HTTPS/SPDY, I agree that "scheme" would be better. > > But here, we want to describe *protocol stack*, so HTTPS == TLS+HTTP, just > as James mentioned above, using *protocol stack* can avoid unnecessary the > risk of combinatorial explosion. > > > > >> >> -- leif >> >> > > > -- > Yunkai Zhang > Work at Taobao > -- Yunkai Zhang Work at Taobao
