On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Igor Galić <i.ga...@brainsware.org> wrote:
> > After some feedback from the Denver Barcap, I've left > the vote open for what must now be more than a week, > but we still only have our three votes. > > is anyone who's actively using 3.2.x still doing tests? > Do you *want* a new 3.2.x release? Or are you all looking > for a stable 3.4.x? > > FWIW, here is our situation. Something we have high on our list right now is a somewhat automated regression testing system for our load case. It's not finished yet, but hopefully "soon" it will be. At that point I hope to be able to test and meaningfully vote on every stable and dev release. I don't really feel it adds much to say +1 when all I did was duplicate what Jenkins does all day. All that being said, I think our plan currently is to move to 3.4.x from 3.2.0. > i > > ----- Original Message ----- > > +1 from me, ubuntu 12.04 x64 > > > > > > 2013/7/8 Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> > > > > > On 7/2/13 2:36 PM, Igor Galić wrote: > > > > > >> Hey folks, > > >> > > >> I've rolled a tar-ball of 3.2.x and I would like > > >> to kick of a voting to get it released! > > >> > > >> You can find it on > > >> > > >> http://people.apache.org/~**igalic/releases/< > http://people.apache.org/~igalic/releases/> > > >> > > > > > > Tested on Fedora Core 18, 64-bit. Passes signature checks, all > > > regressions, and behaves well as both forward and reverse proxy. > > > > > > +1. > > > > > > -- leif > > > > > > > > > > -- > Igor Galić > > Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883 > Mail: i.ga...@brainsware.org > URL: http://brainsware.org/ > GPG: 6880 4155 74BD FD7C B515 2EA5 4B1D 9E08 A097 C9AE > >
