I'm in the process of rolling out 3.2.4 but I'm really waiting for a 3.4
release. Also, this probably isn't the thread for this but I think our
stable releases could get more attention in terms of backports if the
process was slightly easier, i'll start a new discussion on this as it's
something that I've found frustrating.

Brian


On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Igor Galić <i.ga...@brainsware.org> wrote:

>
> After some feedback from the Denver Barcap, I've left
> the vote open for what must now be more than a week,
> but we still only have our three votes.
>
> is anyone who's actively using 3.2.x still doing tests?
> Do you *want* a new 3.2.x release? Or are you all looking
> for a stable 3.4.x?
>
> i
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > +1 from me, ubuntu 12.04 x64
> >
> >
> > 2013/7/8 Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org>
> >
> > > On 7/2/13 2:36 PM, Igor Galić wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hey folks,
> > >>
> > >> I've rolled a tar-ball of 3.2.x and I would like
> > >> to kick of a voting to get it released!
> > >>
> > >> You can find it on
> > >>
> > >>    http://people.apache.org/~**igalic/releases/<
> http://people.apache.org/~igalic/releases/>
> > >>
> > >
> > > Tested on Fedora Core 18, 64-bit. Passes signature checks, all
> > > regressions, and behaves well as both forward and reverse proxy.
> > >
> > > +1.
> > >
> > > -- leif
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> --
> Igor Galić
>
> Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883
> Mail: i.ga...@brainsware.org
> URL: http://brainsware.org/
> GPG: 6880 4155 74BD FD7C B515  2EA5 4B1D 9E08 A097 C9AE
>
>

Reply via email to