----- Original Message ----- > On 3/8/13 9:50 AM, Brian Geffon wrote: > > I'm all for this also, i think at minimum we should take advantage > > of > > what we get for free from c++11, especially since we have c++11 > > checks > > in our autoconf script already anyway. I had never actually heard > > of > > concurrencykit until now. I know TBB isn't really an option, but > > has > > anyone compared the performance of the data structures of TBB to > > concurrencykit? > > Something to look into. I think can be a solid "goal" for v3.5/3.6, > to clean > up these areas, and perhaps finish all the NUMA stuff as well. I'm > hesitant > to a huge change like this so late in the v3.3/3.4 release cycle > though, but > it's up to the community to decide (of course). > > > > But don't let any of that stop you guys from reviewing this patch > > ;) > > Absolutely. I think this is a good incremental improvement to land > for > v3.3.2, for inclusion with v3.4.
+1 on ck in 3.5 I'd suggest we wrap up what have into 3.4 and see to stabelizing that If you want to release 3.4.0 in June, we could branch it off in May, to do so, for one, and to allow those who are eager to make fixes to continue working on trunk. > Cheers, > > -- leif -- i Igor Galić Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883 Mail: i.ga...@brainsware.org URL: http://brainsware.org/ GPG: 6880 4155 74BD FD7C B515 2EA5 4B1D 9E08 A097 C9AE
