On 3/8/13 9:50 AM, Brian Geffon wrote:
I'm all for this also, i think at minimum we should take advantage of what we get for free from c++11, especially since we have c++11 checks in our autoconf script already anyway. I had never actually heard of concurrencykit until now. I know TBB isn't really an option, but has anyone compared the performance of the data structures of TBB to concurrencykit?
Something to look into. I think can be a solid "goal" for v3.5/3.6, to clean up these areas, and perhaps finish all the NUMA stuff as well. I'm hesitant to a huge change like this so late in the v3.3/3.4 release cycle though, but it's up to the community to decide (of course).
But don't let any of that stop you guys from reviewing this patch ;)
Absolutely. I think this is a good incremental improvement to land for v3.3.2, for inclusion with v3.4.
Cheers, -- leif
