+1 from me as well. Running Polygraph performance (on a custom Linux from scratch 32-bit system) and it seems to be stable. Unfortunately I do not have any results from previous builds so I cannot tell if the performance has changed.
On 25 August 2011 13:03, Jack Quinlin <jquin...@yahoo.com> wrote: > +1 from me. > That candidate, url is http://people.apache.org/~zwoop/rel-candidates/ , > works well with CentOS-6.0-x86_64, and on Amazon EC2 linux instances 64bit. > If needed I can install it on other OS as I have most pltaforms on hand or > can easily commandeer a server. > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> > *To:* dev@trafficserver.apache.org; "'us...@trafficserver.apache.org'" < > us...@trafficserver.apache.org> > *Sent:* Monday, August 22, 2011 10:15 AM > *Subject:* [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Server v3.1.0 > > Hi all, > > I've prepared a package for a v3.1.0 release. Please take a look at the > artifacts, check the STATUS/README/CHANGES files, and do builds and tests. > After finishing your examination of the release candidate, please cast your > ±/0 votes, I will call the vote on 8/25/2011. The src tar-ball and > signatures are available in > > http://people.apache.org/~zwoop/rel-candidates/ > > The relevant files are > > minotaur (15:07) 263/0 $ ls -lrt > total 2440 > -rw-r--r-- 1 zwoop zwoop 2439617 Aug 22 00:50 > trafficserver-3.1.0-unstable.tar.bz2 > -rw-r--r-- 1 zwoop zwoop 836 Aug 22 00:50 > trafficserver-3.1.0-unstable.tar.bz2.asc > -rw-r--r-- 1 zwoop zwoop 71 Aug 22 00:50 > trafficserver-3.1.0-unstable.tar.bz2.md5 > -rw-r--r-- 1 zwoop zwoop 79 Aug 22 00:50 > trafficserver-3.1.0-unstable.tar.bz2.sha1 > > > Checksums are > > MD5: 39899ebbfffeb02a6be2afd63765588f *trafficserver-3.1.0 unstable.tar.bz2 > SHA1: c83c26d65dda28ccd130a0d3dc624a8ef15c3af9 > *trafficserver-3.1.0-unstable.tar.bz2 > > > This is primarily a large number of bug fixes over the 3.0.0 release, but > it also adds a foundation for finishing the IPv6 support (to origin > servers). Over 80 bugs / improvements were closed for this release. > > Thanks, > > -- The Apache TS developer community > > > >
