I have a few thoughts:
* What about non-class member variables? In the code, it seems like they are not camel-cased, but underscore separated. Shall we continue to follow this? I'm asking this because class member variables will be camel-cased. * From the example, it seems like '*' is associated with the variable and not the type, i.e., 'char *arg' and not 'char* arg'. Can we state this explicitly and also clarify whether this applies to references also? * In the example, should 'ts' in 'namespace ts' also be camel-cased to 'Ts'? - Manjesh ________________________________ From: Leif Hedstrom [mailto:zw...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 3:26 PM To: Manjesh Nilange Subject: Fwd: coding style -------- Original Message -------- Subject: coding style Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 15:23:41 -0800 From: Bryan Call <bc...@yahoo-inc.com> <mailto:bc...@yahoo-inc.com> Reply-To: trafficserver-dev@incubator.apache.org To: trafficserver-dev@incubator.apache.org I would like to open up a discussion about coding style... I updated the coding style wiki because there was some confusion around method naming and private method naming. http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TS/Coding+Style We are pretty strict on our indentation and we need to be more strict on our class, method, and member names to insure consistency in the code. Unfortunately there is no good tool to automate consistency like there is for indentation. -Bryan
