Sure, any good signature. SHA512 is stronger than SHA1, MD5 and SHA256. It shouldn't take a second more than others. Why use a weaker checksum? Thanking you Sagar Acharya https://designman.org
13 Apr 2021, 20:15 by daniel.cegie...@gmail.com: > How/where SHA512 is better than SHA256 or SHA1? I don't see any added > value in this. If someone breaks into your server and replace files, > may also regenerate check sums (SHA256/512 or SHA3, scrypt etc.). The > use of MD5 will be equally (un)safe as SHA512 :) > > A better solution is e.g. signify from OpenBSD or GnuPG. > > https://man.openbsd.org/signify > > Daniel > > wt., 13 kwi 2021 o 13:36 Sagar Acharya <sagaracha...@tutanota.com> napisał(a): > >> >> Can we have SHA512 checksums and sig files for the release gzips of suckless >> software? >> >> Thanking you >> Sagar Acharya >> https://designman.org >>
