How/where SHA512 is better than SHA256 or SHA1? I don't see any added value in this. If someone breaks into your server and replace files, may also regenerate check sums (SHA256/512 or SHA3, scrypt etc.). The use of MD5 will be equally (un)safe as SHA512 :)
A better solution is e.g. signify from OpenBSD or GnuPG. https://man.openbsd.org/signify Daniel wt., 13 kwi 2021 o 13:36 Sagar Acharya <sagaracha...@tutanota.com> napisał(a): > > Can we have SHA512 checksums and sig files for the release gzips of suckless > software? > > Thanking you > Sagar Acharya > https://designman.org >
