Hi Anselm, I checked the performance of revision 22b5b3cfa6b28f8e0c6c35c04ad9b4cb609b5643 like this:
echo 'foo bar' > index.html doas quark > /dev/null & ab -n 10000 -c 20 'http://localhost:8083/' And I got 942 requests/second, so I'd say there is no significant difference to the current version of quark. Kind regards, Richard Anselm Garbe <garb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Richard, > > On Mon, 23 Sep 2019 at 11:34, <maillists.rul...@mailbox.org> wrote: > > I'm toying with quark and noticed it's comparatively poor performance in > > my use case. I used Apache bench to benchmark the web server. With this > > setup I got 980 requests/second: > > Out of curiosity, can you do me a favour and check a very old revision like > > 22b5b3cfa6b28f8e0c6c35c04ad9b4cb609b5643 > > instead. This one was fork() based and kind of the state I know of > quark. Seems that quark has accumulated a lot of cruft since then... > > I'd be curios what performance pattern you see with that. > > I leave it to the current maintainer to assess your finding. > > Best regards, > Anselm
