Hi Richard,

On Mon, 23 Sep 2019 at 11:34, <maillists.rul...@mailbox.org> wrote:
> I'm toying with quark and noticed it's comparatively poor performance in
> my use case. I used Apache bench to benchmark the web server. With this
> setup I got 980 requests/second:

Out of curiosity, can you do me a favour and check a very old revision like

    22b5b3cfa6b28f8e0c6c35c04ad9b4cb609b5643

instead. This one was fork() based and kind of the state I know of
quark. Seems that quark has accumulated a lot of cruft since then...

I'd be curios what performance pattern you see with that.

I leave it to the current maintainer to assess your finding.

Best regards,
Anselm

Reply via email to