Hi On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Egmont Koblinger <egm...@gmail.com> wrote: > I came across patches for the Solarized color scheme under > https://st.suckless.org/patches/solarized/ . > > I wuold like to point out that the "light" variant, along with its > screenshot, is incorrect. > > According to the Solarized homepage > https://ethanschoonover.com/solarized/ , the section "The Values", > each of the 0-15 indices have a corresponding fixed RGB value. There's > not a single word about reversing the order of base03..base3. > > Underneath, the section "Usage & Development" also illustrates that > the RGB definition of base03 and friends do not change. It is the > responsibility of applications to emit reversed values if that's what > makes sense for them, according to whether they wish to use the dark > or light variant. (And above, under Features -> Precision & Symmetry > this is demonstrated as a sass (scss) snippet, but that's unrelated to > terminal emulation and the concept of indices 0-15, it corresponds to > what let's say "vim" would probably also do when implementing a dark > solarized and a light solarized pair of skins.) > > In the two variants, the palette of 16 should be identical. It is only > defaultfg and defaultbg that should differ.
Patches welcome! Cheers, Silvan
