k.suzaki wrote: > I want to know why another libc is bad (or good?) to build stali. > I guess it resembles to Harden Gentoo which allows to build uclib and musl. > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Hardened_uClibc > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Hardened_musl
Please see the comparison: http://www.etalabs.net/compare_libcs.html It is relatively old but you can get the idea. Alpine Linux back in the day switched to musl from uClibc, see the thread here: http://lists.alpinelinux.org/alpine-devel/3600.html musl is also specifically designed for static linking and has partial binary compatibility with glibc. Using glibc with stali is, at the very least, not clever. https://www.musl-libc.org/intro.html -- caóc
