Daniel Cegiełka wrote: > > musl is the only alternative, fairly feature complete, libc, that is still > > being developed. uClibc/dietlibc haven't been around for many years > https://cgit.openadk.org/cgi/cgit/uclibc-ng.git/log/
Forgot about it. Anyway it doesn't see that much activity comparing to musl. > yup... and next one is bearssl > https://bearssl.org/ What is so great about it? I only know about Libre/OpenSSL and the GNU implementation. P.S. By Linux I meant kernel related solutions. Cheers -- caóc
