no, it's great they all are incompetent to create usable apis, it means i don't have to waste my time with their shitty content either.
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Sylvain BERTRAND <sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 01:17:38PM +0000, Cág wrote: >> Staven wrote: >> >> >or do you know a better compromise than webkit? >> >> Yeah, write our own web engine with blackjack and hookers, which is >> mentioned on Project ideas page. > > c++ software pulls also a c++ compiler and runtime in their dependencies, > which > are horrendous compared to a C compiler/miminal runtime. > > When you add up all of this, we are in no compromise but a total rip off and > take over of those critical software components by very few corporations. > > Then I repeat myself, this is no compromise here, it's just being fuc*ed all > the way. > > If I want to sabotage or take over a software component, I'll migrate it to > c++ > and push hard on a brain damaged object oriented design to scare away any > reasonably skilled coders. Moreover that design will be so fuc*ed up, it will > generate tons of bugs and security holes to justify a good salary for idiotic > bosses (or as corrupted as their coders). > > The real pb are web coders: many of the web sites could have a noscript portal > without losing significant functionalities. The web sites which _must_ have a > rich GUI (hence a dynamic browser, for instance soundcloud) should provide an > simple web API (without that pile of cra* which is OAuth). > > I'm about to sue some french administrations over their www sites and my > french > bank www sites for their lack of interop with light www browsers. > > -- > Sylvain >
