On 7 October 2016 at 16:24, Bruno Vetter <simplelife2...@outlook.com> wrote: > yes, it's tedious and I understand that it's not crucial to have the > toolchain statically linked. Trying to do so also brings up a lot of > questions that I cannot answer easily. For example a statically linked linker > apparently does not support an lto plugin. I have no idea if that would be > acceptable for a toolchain. > > I might just go on with the existing toolchain as you describe. Thanks much > for your help.
You can give http://ellcc.org/ a shot, apparently most parts of it are statically linked. I got stali partially compiled with it, though I stopped at libressl which had some linux header problems apparently with ellcc's includes that I haven't resolved yet. But it didn't appear too hard to be worked around. Cheers, Anselm
