On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:54 PM, Britton Kerin <[email protected]> wrote: > dwm needs patches to be good but the patches area is a mess and I > couln't get along with devs about fixing it, so I thought a pre-rolled > version of dwm might be useful instead: >
You raise a good point in my opinion: when someone uploads a patch to the wiki it should be maintained, atleast on the current stable version of a tool, dwm in this case. There are alot of patches that are messy, but at the same time with some programming knowledge (expected from suckless "users") the patches are easy to adapt. > brittonkerin.com/sdwm > > ...snip snip... > > This isn't meant as a hostile fork. It could in theory usefully live > on suckless.org under flavors/ or something where others might want to > put similar stuff. This is why there is a wiki section for the patches with optional features. We don't want to merge every feature in dwm. Some people like it, others don't. At this time I expect most people to have their own "dwm fork", it is nothing special. Kind regards, Hiltjo
