On 02/26/2016 10:56 AM, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
In any case, if there*were* an attempt, with more manpower, either to reverse engineer the binary sam protocol or to implement a new editor, then I'd be very happy to lend a hand.
Thanks for your thoughtful reply. What about a third option: use the core (editing and structural regexps) of sam (the part that runs with sam -d perhaps) and add a TUI. Do we have to re-use the undocumented binary protocol just because samterm uses it?
