On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 10:13:06 +0100 "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
Hey Eugene, > so you insist, on your stupid strncmp() > ok. good luck. nah, just refactored the code. Refactoring means that you generally don't change the behaviour. I think, before we can even start discussing this properly, the codebase should be free of "bloat". :P I also see no reason to add a specific usage-eprintf-function. What's wrong with the strncmp()? Tell me please! Cheers FRIGN -- FRIGN <[email protected]>
