On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 10:13:06 +0100 "e...@bestmx.net" <e...@bestmx.net> wrote:
Hey Eugene, > so you insist, on your stupid strncmp() > ok. good luck. nah, just refactored the code. Refactoring means that you generally don't change the behaviour. I think, before we can even start discussing this properly, the codebase should be free of "bloat". :P I also see no reason to add a specific usage-eprintf-function. What's wrong with the strncmp()? Tell me please! Cheers FRIGN -- FRIGN <d...@frign.de>
